What is Zero Trust Network Security?

What is zero trust network security? 

Zero Trust Network Security (ZTNS) is a cybersecurity model that shifts the traditional approach of perimeter-based defenses, where the assumption was that everything inside the network could be trusted. Instead, Zero Trust adopts a “never trust, always verify” principle, assuming that no user or device, whether inside or outside the network, should be automatically trusted.

Key principles of Zero Trust Security include:

1. Least-Privilege Access: Users and devices are granted the minimum level of access they need to perform their tasks, and this access is continually reassessed.
2. Continuous Verification: Instead of verifying a user’s identity only once (e.g., during login), Zero Trust continuously verifies the identity and access permissions of users, devices, and applications throughout the session.
3. Micro-Segmentation: Networks are divided into smaller segments, and access to these segments is tightly controlled and monitored. Even if an attacker gains access to one segment, they cannot easily move laterally within the network.
4. Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): To strengthen identity verification, users must provide multiple forms of authentication, like a password plus a second factor such as a mobile device confirmation.
5. Device and User Context: Policies are based on context, such as the device’s security posture, its location, and the user’s behavior. If any activity appears suspicious, the system may prompt for additional authentication or block access.
6. Logging and Monitoring: Continuous monitoring and logging are essential to detect suspicious activities in real time and respond to potential security incidents quickly.

In essence, Zero Trust Network Security eliminates the concept of implicit trust and instead treats every access request as potentially malicious, enforcing strict identity verification and least-privilege access policies to reduce the risk of breaches.

What are the five pillars of zero trust? 

The five pillars of Zero Trust are the foundational components that support a comprehensive Zero Trust security architecture. These pillars are essential for implementing and maintaining a Zero Trust model effectively. They include:

1. User/Identity

• Purpose: Verifying and managing the identities of users, devices, and services to ensure that only authorized entities can access resources.
• Principles: This pillar involves robust identity management, including Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), least-privilege access, and ensuring that the right users have the right access at the right time. Identity is continuously verified, especially as users change locations, devices, or networks.

2. Device

• Purpose: Ensuring that devices seeking access to the network and its resources meet security standards and are trusted.
• Principles: This involves monitoring and controlling devices such as laptops, mobile phones, and IoT devices to ensure they are secure and authorized. Device health and compliance checks are performed regularly, and unauthorized devices are blocked or restricted.

3. Network/Environment

• Purpose: Securing communication and controlling access within network segments through continuous monitoring and micro-segmentation.
• Principles: This pillar covers network-level security, including the isolation of network resources using micro-segmentation, encryption of communications, and strict access controls to minimize lateral movement of threats. Network traffic is continuously inspected to detect suspicious behavior.

4. Application/Workload

• Purpose: Protecting applications and workloads by controlling who can access them, ensuring secure communication, and enforcing security policies.
• Principles: This involves ensuring that applications and services, whether on-premise or in the cloud, are secure. Access to applications is based on user identity, device security posture, and the context of the request. Security is enforced consistently across all environments, including hybrid and multi-cloud setups.

5. Data

• Purpose: Protecting data at rest, in transit, and in use through encryption, access controls, and monitoring.
• Principles: This pillar focuses on safeguarding data wherever it resides or moves. Organizations must apply strong encryption, implement strict access policies, and continuously monitor data to prevent unauthorized access, leaks, or theft. Data classification and rights management are often used to ensure that sensitive information is protected.

By addressing each of these five pillars, organizations can ensure that they have a well-rounded, robust Zero Trust security model in place. Each pillar works in tandem with the others to reduce risk and improve the organization’s security posture.

What is an example of a zero trust network? 

An example of Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) can be illustrated in a typical scenario where an employee wants to access a company’s internal application remotely.

Example Scenario: Remote Access to a Corporate Application

Imagine an employee, Sarah, working from home and trying to access a sensitive internal HR application hosted on her company’s network.

1. User Authentication:
   • When Sarah attempts to log into the HR application, the Zero Trust system doesn’t automatically trust her based on her initial credentials alone.
   • Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) is enforced, so Sarah must provide not only her password but also a second factor (like a verification code sent to her mobile phone) to prove her identity.

2. Device Verification:

1. • The Zero Trust system verifies that Sarah is using a company-approved, secure laptop. It checks if her device complies with the organization’s security policies (e.g., whether her system has the latest antivirus, OS patches, and encryption in place).
   • If Sarah is using an unapproved or non-compliant device, access could be denied, or she might be granted limited access with extra security checks (such as a virtual desktop or restricted privileges).

3. Contextual Access Control:

1. • The Zero Trust system also evaluates contextual information, such as Sarah’s location (her home), the time of access, and the network she is connecting from.
   • If anything seems suspicious (e.g., an unexpected login attempt from a foreign country), the system might block access, ask for additional verification, or alert the IT team for investigation.

4. Least-Privilege Access:

1. • Once Sarah is authenticated and her device is verified, she isn’t given access to the entire corporate network. Instead, she can only access the specific HR application she needs, and she is granted the minimum level of access required to perform her tasks within that application.
   • This limits the potential damage if her account or device were to be compromised, preventing lateral movement across the network.

5. Continuous Monitoring and Dynamic Risk Assessment:

1. • Even after Sarah gains access, the Zero Trust system continuously monitors her activities within the HR application.
   • If the system detects unusual behavior, such as accessing unusually large amounts of sensitive data or attempting actions outside her normal scope, it can trigger a risk-based response-such as requiring re-authentication, restricting access, or flagging the incident for review.

6. End of Session:

1. • Once Sarah finishes her work, her session automatically terminates, and access permissions are revoked until the next login attempt. This ensures that no residual access persists after her session ends.

Key Zero Trust Elements in This Example:

• Continuous Authentication: Even after Sarah initially logs in, her behavior and access are monitored continuously.
• Context-Aware Policies: Sarah’s access is contingent on factors like her device’s compliance, location, and the time of access.
• Micro-Segmentation: Sarah only has access to the HR application, not the entire network.
• Least-Privilege: Sarah’s access is restricted to just what she needs for her role within the application.

This is a classic example of how Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) functions to secure a corporate network by ensuring no implicit trust is granted, even for legitimate users. Each step adds an additional layer of security to reduce risk and prevent unauthorized access to sensitive resources.

What’s the difference between a VPN and zero trust? 

The main difference between VPN (Virtual Private Network) and Zero Trust security lies in how they approach access control, trust, and network security. Here’s a breakdown of the key distinctions between the two:

1. Trust Model

• VPN: VPNs operate on a traditional perimeter-based trust model, where users or devices that are authenticated and inside the network perimeter are implicitly trusted. Once a user connects via a VPN, they have access to the internal network, and typically, all resources behind the VPN firewall can be accessed without further verification.
• Zero Trust: In contrast, the Zero Trust model assumes that no one (whether inside or outside the network) should be trusted by default. Zero Trust continuously verifies identity, context, and security posture, enforcing the principle of “never trust, always verify.” Even after initial authentication, access to specific resources requires further verification and is granted based on least-privilege access policies.

2. Access Control

• VPN: Once connected, a VPN typically gives users broad access to the internal network. This can expose a large attack surface if an account is compromised, as attackers can potentially move laterally through the network.
• Zero Trust: Zero Trust enforces strict access controls based on user identity, device health, location, and other factors. Access is granted on a per-resource or per-application basis, meaning users are only given access to specific resources they need for their tasks. Micro-segmentation limits lateral movement within the network.

3. Granular Security

• VPN: VPNs offer a “one-size-fits-all” approach. Once a user is authenticated, there’s little granularity in what they can access or control over how they behave inside the network. Security is focused mainly on the connection, rather than continuous monitoring.
• Zero Trust: Zero Trust provides granular security controls, enforcing access at the application, data, and user levels. It continuously monitors all access and verifies identity and device posture for each resource request. If the risk level changes during a session, Zero Trust can revoke access or request additional verification dynamically.

4. User Experience

• VPN: Users typically need to manually connect to the VPN to access corporate resources, which can create friction, especially for remote workers. VPNs can also introduce performance bottlenecks because all traffic is routed through a centralized server.
• Zero Trust: Zero Trust is more seamless for users since it operates in the background, continuously verifying and authorizing access as users interact with resources. Since Zero Trust policies can be enforced directly in the cloud or at the application layer, performance impacts are minimized, and users do not need to connect to a central VPN server.

5. Scalability

• VPN: VPNs can be difficult to scale, especially for large organizations with many remote workers. VPN servers may become overwhelmed as more users connect, leading to performance issues. Additionally, VPN infrastructure may not integrate well with cloud environments or modern hybrid setups.
• Zero Trust: Zero Trust is designed to be scalable and cloud-native, making it well-suited for remote work and hybrid environments. It can integrate across on-premise, cloud, and multi-cloud architectures without relying on a single entry point like a VPN server.

6. Security Posture

• VPN: VPNs are vulnerable to certain attacks such as man-in-the-middle attacks, and they offer limited control once a user gains access. If a VPN account is compromised, attackers can gain full access to internal resources.
• Zero Trust: Zero Trust enhances the overall security posture by continuously verifying users, devices, and applications. Even if a user’s credentials are compromised, attackers are restricted by policies that limit access, and abnormal behavior will trigger alerts or require additional verification.

While VPNs provide a secure way to connect to a private network, they operate on a traditional “trusted inside, untrusted outside” model. Zero Trust, on the other hand, is a modern approach that eliminates the need for implicit trust, providing continuous verification and enforcing strict security at every access point, no matter the user’s location or device.

Related Reading

Strengthening IoT Security with Cloud-Native DHCP Listening

By Kate Asaff | January 14, 2023

Enhanced IoT Fingerprinting & Security with Cloud-Native DHCP Listening More Like the Internet of Everything With the explosion of new devices connecting to the internet, IoT (or, the Internet of Things) really might as well be called IoE (or, the Internet of Everything.) The use cases for always-connected devices span across industries – from facilities… Read More →

How to Prevent IoT from Ruining Your Life

By Kate Asaff | May 30, 2023

One of the worst things you can go through as a company is a data breach. It costs a small fortune (average of $4.35 million as of 2022), destroys your reputation, often leads to bankruptcy, and takes a massive toll on your employee’s well-being. Thus, preventing a data breach should be top of your to-do list. Today, that means taking a hard look at your connected endpoints – starting with IoT – and making sure you have the necessary tools to keep them from putting you at risk.  Read More →

The Security Compliance Conundrum: Adapting to the Era of IoT, Hybrid Work & AI

By Michael Marvin | July 25, 2023

The rise of the Internet of Things (IoT), the adoption of hybrid work models, and the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) have revolutionized the way organizations operate. As we embrace the endless possibilities brought by these technological advancements, we must also confront the complex challenges they present, especially concerning security compliance. In an era where… Read More →